Legal Opinion

Riggs v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1909No. 15,912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, C. J.

This is a proceeding in error from the district court for Lancaster county. An information containing three counts was filed in that court, charging plaintiff in error with keeping for sale certain intoxicating liquors in violation of section 20 and following, ch. 50, Comp. St. 1907. The first count charged plaintiff in error with unlawfully keeping for sale certain malt and intoxicating liquors known as beer; the second count with keeping spirituous liquors for the unlawful purpose; and the third count with keeping for the same purpose certain vinous liquors. The proceeding was instituted in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Steinkuhler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Yeoman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Naftalin v. John Wood CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. State v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State v. AckermanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
  4. Bunch & Piece Sales, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API