Legal Opinion

Herring v. Gorczyk

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 21, 2001No. 01-283PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

Inmate plaintiff filed a V.R.C.P. 75 petition for review of governmental action challenging his conviction for a disciplinary rule violation. Defendant, Vermont Department of Corrections (hereinafter “DOC”), filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court denied DOC’s motion and granted summary judgment to plaintiff. DOC appeals. Because we hold that plaintiffs due process rights at the disciplinary hearing were violated by the hearing officer’s reliance on statements of confidential informants without any independent assessment of the informants’ credibility, we affirm the lower court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kenneth Gaston v. Thomas A. Coughlin, III Donald Selsky Lt. Grant Lebaron, Lt. Hans Walker Frank Irvin Edward Dann John Doe, Confidential InformantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Jackson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. King v. GorczykSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. In Re HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Rodriguez v. PallitoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. Brassard v. PallitoVermont Superior Court · 2014
  5. Cione v. DemlVermont Superior Court · 2025

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API