Legal Opinion

Mateo v. Alpha Mechanical Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 5, 2001, which ruled that claimant did not suffer a causally related injury and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant, a steamfitter, collapsed while hoisting a steel pipe atop a scaffold and thereafter applied for workers’ compensation benefits. Following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge (hereinafter WCLJ) found that claimant had established a compensable injury based upon evidence that the stress of claimant’s work activities had triggered his preexisting heart disease and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claim of Van Patten v. Quandt's Wholesale DistributorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Claim of Tompkins v. Sunrise Heating Fuels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Claim of Owoc v. Syracuse UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Becker v. Stryco Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Curatolo v. Sofia Fabulous PizzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Matter of Jewett v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API