Legal Opinion · Dissent

Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 25, 2012No. Nos. A11-1479, A11-1480Published

1DissentStras, Justice

I agree with the court that we lack jurisdiction over appeal number All-1480. However, I respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that we lack jurisdiction over appeal number All-1479, which involves Beuning Family LP’s petition regarding taxes payable in 2009. In appeal number All-1479, Stearns County filed a motion for summary judgment with the tax court, claiming that the tax court lacked *131jurisdiction to decide Beuning’s petition because it was not timely filed. When the tax court denied the County’s motion, the County timely appealed to this court by filing a writ of certiorari.

The…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Riley v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. McCannel v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API