Legal Opinion

Louis Kuzminsky v. Leroy Woodard

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 6, 1962No. 16496_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this suit for personal injuries the District Court directed a verdict for the defendant after a jury had failed to agree. We think there should be-a new trial.

The plaintiff testified that he was standing in a crosswalk when he was struck by the defendant’s car. The defendant testified in effect that the plaintiff stepped off a loading platform and walked against the side of the car. Which version is correct is a typical jury question. If a jury believed the plaintiff’s version, it might reasonably conclude that the defendant was negligent in failing to yield the right of way to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henkelmann v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  2. Capital Transit Co. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Peck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reginald Law v. Virginia Stage Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. Broderick v. GletnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Louis Kuzminsky v. Leroy WoodardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  4. Reginald Law v. Virginia Stage Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. Reginald Law v. Virginia Stage Lines, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API