Legal Opinion

American Civil Liberties Union Foundation v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1598Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ) UNION FOUNDATION, ) ) FEMHEALTH USA, INC., d/b/a CARAFEM, ) ) MILO WORLDWIDE LLC, ) ) PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT ) OF ANIMALS, INC., ) ) Civil Action No. 17-cv-01598 (TSC) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) WASHINGTON METROPOLITIAN AREA ) TRANSIT AUTHORITY, ) ) PAUL J. WIEDEFELD, ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) prohibits certain kinds of advertisements in the metro system. Plaintiffs American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”), Femhealth USA,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Pleasant Grove City v. SummumSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API