State v. Winstead
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
Following a bench trial in Claremont District Court (Yazinski, J.), the defendant, William T. Winstead, was found guilty of driving while intoxicated. See RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002). On appeal, he contends that: (1) the trial court erred when it admitted the results of his blood alcohol test; (2) he was denied equal protection of the law; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove he was in control of the vehicle. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. The charge arose out of an incident on April 6, 2002, when, at approximately 3:13 a.m., Officer Shawn L. Hallock of the Claremont…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atkinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- State v. PattersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. WillardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. LegereSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- State v. EricsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- In Re MannionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.