Legal Opinion

T & W Farm Supply, Inc. v. McCall

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1974No. 49601PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

1. By supplemental record forwarding the order of the trial court it affirmatively appears that the court exercised, and did not abuse, its discretion in allowing an affidavit in opposition to the motion for summary judgment to be filed and served on the day of the hearing. Consequently no error appears. Malone v. Ottinger, 118 Ga. App. 778, 782 (165 SE2d 660); Supreme Oil Co. v. Brock, 129 Ga. App. 863 (1) (201 SE2d 659) and cits.; Johnson v. Frazier, 121 Ga. App. 212 (1) (173 SE2d 434).

2. While the instant case is similar to Farmers Mut. Exchange v. Sisk, 131 Ga. App. 206 (205…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Malone v. OttingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  2. Supreme Oil Co. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Farmers Mutual Exchange of Commerce, Inc. v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Johnson v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Liberty National Life Insurance v. HoukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Leagan v. LevineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance Company v. HoukCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Liberty National Life Insurance v. HoukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API