Gibson v. Gibson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in holding him in contempt and ordering him confined until he pays the total arrearage on his alimony and child support payments because there is no evidence in the record to support the finding by the court that he presently has the means to comply with the order of 25 March 1971.
Despite defendant’s obvious unwillingness to cooperate when he was called as a witness for plaintiff, and his evasive and incredible testimony with respect to his assets and liabilities and his ability to comply with the order to pay child support and alimony,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Teague v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Rayfield v. RayfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Swink v. SwinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holt v. HoltCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Upchurch v. UpchurchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Bowes v. BowesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Byrd v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.