Legal Opinion
(PS) Bledsoe v. Facebook
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 30, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02756Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONNELL BLEDSOE, No. 2:18-cv-2756-JAM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 FACEBOOK; MARK ZUCKERBERG, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 His 18 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 3. 19 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 20 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 21 inquiry. Pursuant to §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Denny Lee LONDON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Eduardo C. Bautista v. Pan American World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.