Legal Opinion
Da Cunha v. Grasselli Chemical Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 30, 1942No. Civil Action No. 2230PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEANEY, District Judge.
In this action the defendants, appearing specially, have moved to strike the complaint, as amended, on the ground of improper venue.
The plaintiff, as appears from the amended complaint and from admissions made at the argumenut of this motion, is a citizen of Portugal, residing in New Jersey, who sues for personal injuries sustained while in employ of defendants. The defendant, Grasselli Chemical Company, was formerly a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business in New Jersey, by compliance with New Jersey Revised Statutes 14:15-3, N. J.S.A. 14:15-3, etc. This…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Beard v. Continental Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. v. Mylan Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Litton Ind. Systems v. Kennedy Van Saun Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Randolph Laboratories, Inc. v. Specialties Development Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Dodenhoff v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947