Legal Opinion

Nobel Insurance v. Austin Powder Co.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided April 4, 2003No. CIV. 02-2090PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAWSON, District Judge.

Nobel Insurance Company (hereinafter “Nobel”) brings this diversity action seeking a declaratory judgment that an insurance policy it issued to Austin Powder Company (hereinafter “Austin Powder”) provided no coverage for a personal-injury claim asserted against APAC-Arkansas, Inc., d/b/a/ Arkhola Sand and Gravel Company (hereinafter “APAC”) as an additionally named insured. Nobel also seeks reimbursement for sums it expended to defend and settle the claim against APAC, while reserving its right to contest coverage. Currently before the Court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Terra Nova Insurance Company, Ltd. v. 900 Bar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  2. United National Insurance Company v. Sst Fitness CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Dreyfus v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Steadfast Insurance v. Sheridan Children's Healthcare Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America v. Hillerich & Bradsby Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  3. Cincinnati Insurance v. Grand Pointe, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007
  4. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API