Legal Opinion

Tristate Development & Construction, Inc. v. Tau Kyu Kim

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided November 7, 2006No. Case No. CL-2005-2985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Kathleen H. MacKay

Under Virginia law, the equitable remedy of rescission is not permitted for the mere breach of a contract. Some jurisdictions permit rescission for a breach of the contract. 17 Am. Jur. 2d, § 554, p. 525 (2004). Rescission is a permissible remedy when a party alleges and proves a failure of consideration. Andrews v. Sams, 233 Va. 55, 59, 353 S.E.2d 735 (1987); Bolling v. King Coal Theatres, 185 Va. 991, 997, 41 S.E.2d 59 (1947); Neely v. White, 177 Va. 358, 366-67, 14 S.E.2d 337 (1941); Southeast Lumber Co. v. Friend, 158 Va. 863, 869, 164 S.E. 372 (1932).

Defendant/C…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neely v. WhiteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. Bolling v. King Coal Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  3. Andrews v. SamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  4. Neale v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Southeast Lumber Export Co. v. FriendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bui Thi Bich Hong, et al. v. Mississippi Development Regional Center, LLC, et al.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API