Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1929No. 12661PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Offense, felony theft; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment describes the alleged stolen property as “one 34 — 7 Goodyear Diamond tread casing of the value of $60.15; one inner tube of the value of $7.60; and one rim of the value of $3.25.” It is claimed that this description of the property was too vague and indefinite to put the defendant upon notice of what he was charged with stealing. It is only required under Article 403, C. C. P., that property be described by name, kind, quality, number and ownership. Taking these allegations as a whole, we do not think…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API