Legal Opinion

Sears Roebuck & Co. v. Harris

New Jersey Circuit Court

Decided February 21, 1944Published

1Opinion of the Court

Burling, C. C. J.

Motion has been made to strike the answer in'the aboye entitled cause of action upon the following grounds:

*85Because the said answer and defenses are frivolous and do not set forth good and sufficient defenses to an action in replevin;

Further to strike out the counter-claim filed by the defendant, which was incorporated as to form in the second defense of the answer.

Upon the argument of the motion the defendants consented to the granting of a motion to strike out the counter-claim.

The remaining issue raised is a narrow one, namely that the sale of a certain Everready water pump…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. Chicago, Burlington & Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Frech v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. People's State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Hirsch v. C. W. Leatherbee Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  5. Leatherbury v. ConnorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API