Swinney v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SNYDER, Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment denying a Rule 27.26 motion movant contends that the *687wording of the jury’s verdict is ambiguous, that the jury may have meant to find him guilty of assault with intent to kill without malice instead of assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought. This court affirms the judgment denying the motion.
Movant Raymond Swinney was convicted of assault with intent to kill with malice aforethought and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. On appeal the judgment was affirmed. State v. Swinney, 558 S.W.2d 363 (Mo.App.1977). Movant’s amended 27.26…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hardnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- State v. McCarthySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State v. WeaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Woods v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brager v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ballard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981