Legal Opinion

Lenz v. Warden of the Sussex I State Prison

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 5, 2004No. Record 012883PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy

In this case we granted a rehearing to the Warden to consider whether trial counsel were ineffective because they did not object to the verdict form given to the jury in the sentencing phase of petitioner’s capital murder trial. The Warden argues that the verdict form the jury considered was proper under this Court’s holding in Atkins v. Commonwealth, 257 Va. 160, 178, 510 S.E.2d 445, 456 (1999), and that trial counsel could not have been ineffective for failing to anticipate this Court’s subsequent decision in Powell v. Commonwealth, 261 Va. 512, 545, 552 S.E.2d 344, 363 (2001), requiring…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Riner v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Michael William Lenz v. Gerald K. Washington, Acting Warden, Sussex I State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. Morrisette v. WARDEN OF SUSSEX ISupreme Court of Virginia · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API