Legal Opinion

State v. Pennington

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 21, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

119 N.J. 547 (1990)

575 A.2d 816

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

FRANK PENNINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 6, 1989.

Decided June 21, 1990.

Lois De Julio, First Assistant Deputy Public Defender, and James L. Jukes, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).

Nancy A. Hulett, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Peter N. Perretti, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J.

A jury found defendant,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API