Legal Opinion

Head v. Dyson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Jewell District Court. The opinion states the case. Judgment for the defendants, C. Dyson and W. M. Allen, at the April Term, 1883. Plaintiff, Head, brings it here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brought an action against the two defendants in error and one J. M. *75Mclndoo, on a promissory note. The defendants in error answered, alleging that they were only sureties on the note; that Mclndoo was principal, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, and that plaintiff, after the maturity of the note, and without the knowledge or consent of these defendants, gave for a valuable consideration an extension to Mclndoo, thereby releasing the defendants as sureties from further liability. Judgment was rendered by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burton v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Luke v. JohnnycakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. RetfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sternbock v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Nelson v. American Cement Plaster Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Rhea v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Sloan v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. State v. DanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API