Head v. Dyson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Jewell District Court. The opinion states the case. Judgment for the defendants, C. Dyson and W. M. Allen, at the April Term, 1883. Plaintiff, Head, brings it here for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, brought an action against the two defendants in error and one J. M. *75Mclndoo, on a promissory note. The defendants in error answered, alleging that they were only sureties on the note; that Mclndoo was principal, to the knowledge of the plaintiff, and that plaintiff, after the maturity of the note, and without the knowledge or consent of these defendants, gave for a valuable consideration an extension to Mclndoo, thereby releasing the defendants as sureties from further liability. Judgment was rendered by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burton v. BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Luke v. JohnnycakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Rld. v. RetfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sternbock v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Nelson v. American Cement Plaster Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Rhea v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Sloan v. PierceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. DanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1928