Tate v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Judge.
This is a prosecution under the provisions of Code 1923, § 3886. The indictment is in the words prescribed by Code 1923, § 3887 — for a prosecution under the said section 3886.
The bill of exceptions (though made up in violation of well-known rules) will not be stricken, on the authority of Pres Hardwick et al. v. State, ante, p. 536, 164 So. 107.
The single cotrnt of the indictment in its pertinent part reads as follows: “* * * L. C. Tate * * * willfully set off or exploded dynamite or other explosive in or under the dwelling house of C. L. Bransford, in which there was at the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gunter v. LeckeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Hardwick v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1935
- Garrison v. SumnersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilcutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Wilcutt v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960