Legal Opinion
In re Riverview Products, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 20, 1940No. 29068PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
It is my opinion that the decision of the referee must be affirmed.
In his memorandum, the referee has set forth certain details regarding the claims in controversy, which need not be repeated.
The claims in suit involve material facts which are different than those in the Matter of Rochester Pad & Wrapper Co., 20 F.Supp. 295, 34 A.B.R.,N.S„ 396, decided by this court. In that case the action was brought after permission was granted by the bankruptcy court; the trustee was a party defendant; no demand was made for deficiency judgment in the action; claims were filed as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richmond Mortgage & Loan Corp. v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Honeyman v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- New York Life Insurance v. H. & J. Guttag Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Ardlea Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Tedlock Cattle Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Merrick Sponsor Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Official Cattle Contract Holders Committee v. CommonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977