Legal Opinion

Automatic Strapping Machine Co. v. Twisted Wire & Steel Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Twisted Wire and Steel Company and another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 25th day of June, 1913, overruling separate demurrers to the amended complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

Each defendant demurs to the amended complaint on the grounds that causes of action have been improperly united, in that it purports to set forth an alleged cause of action against the defendant Twisted Wire Box Strap Company, which for brevity will be referred to as the Box Strap Company, for a breach of contract, and another against the defendant Twisted Wire and Steel Company, which for brevity will be referred to as the Steel Company, arising out of a transaction alleged to have been had between the two defendants, as the result of which it is claimed that the Steel Company…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Irvine v. . New York Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. J. H. Lane & Co. v. United Oil Cloth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Stein v. . WhitmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Stein v. WhitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of New York v. Turnpike Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re the Estate of AndersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1983
  3. Groshoff v. St. Gertrude's ConventIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Hammer v. Independent Lamp & Wire Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  5. Hammer v. Independent Lamp & Wire Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API