Legal Opinion

Stalikas v. Ocampos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Nancy E. Nathan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. There is an issue of fact whether Nathan’s conduct in signaling defendant Sandra Ocampos to pull her vehicle in front of Nathan’s vehicle was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff Stephen Stalikas, Jr., or whether the conduct of Ocampos was a superseding cause of those injuries (see, Barber v Merchant, 180 AD2d 984, 986-987; cf., Valdez v Bernard, 123 AD2d 351). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valdez v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Barber v. MerchantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. MangioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API