Commonwealth v. Hoke
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County
1Opinion of the Court
BIESTER, J.,
The above-captioned matter, now before us on defendant’s *308post-trial motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, presents us with essentially an issue of first impression in the courts of our commonwealth. The issue is whether the erroneous entry and brief stay into the jury room during deliberations of an exhibit, which had not been admitted into evidence, but had been in view of the jury for an extended period of time in the courtroom, is grounds for a new trial. Our review of the limited case law which addresses similar issues strongly suggests and we determine that, in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alfred Dallago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Commonwealth v. CapitoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. OsborneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- United States v. Friedland, David, in No. 80-2052 United States of America v. Friedland, Jacob, in No. 80-2053Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MauteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.