Bailey v. Litten
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Chancery Court of Lawrence. Heard before Hon. R. L. Watkins. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, J.
This is a bill in equity for an assignment of dower, and discloses that the complainant had in the life of her husband joined with him in a conveyance of the lands in which dower is claimed to Falk, the intestate of the appellee Litten. The legal sufficiency of this conveyance to bar the complainant of dower is not questioned. It is averred, however, that the complainant was induced into its execution by the fraud and undue influence of Falk, the grantee, and therefore the court is prayed to remove it as a bar to'dower. We will pass over without consideration any *283insufficiency or defect in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Juzan v. ToulminSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Hoot v. SorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
- Smith's Heirs v. Branch Bank at MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Henderson v. MabrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kelly v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Allison v. StevensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Forsyth v. Preer, Illges & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Howle v. North Birmingham Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- National Building & Loan Ass'n v. BallardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.