Thomas v. Othman
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Cunningham, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Richard and Gail Thomas appeal from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion of defendants-appellees Akram Othman and Mark Woehler to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
I. Background Facts and Procedure
{¶ 2} This appeal arises from the Thomases' efforts to recover from Othman and Woehler a portion of the retirement funds the Thomases lost after investing them in a Ponzi…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Donell v. KowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- White v. PitmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Plush v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Bates Recycling, Inc. v. ConawayOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Twang, L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Fox Consulting Group, Inc. v. Mailing Servs. of Pittsburgh, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.