Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Othman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 2017No. C–160827PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Richard and Gail Thomas appeal from the judgment of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion of defendants-appellees Akram Othman and Mark Woehler to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. Background Facts and Procedure

{¶ 2} This appeal arises from the Thomases' efforts to recover from Othman and Woehler a portion of the retirement funds the Thomases lost after investing them in a Ponzi…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Donell v. KowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. White v. PitmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Plush v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Bates Recycling, Inc. v. ConawayOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Twang, L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Fox Consulting Group, Inc. v. Mailing Servs. of Pittsburgh, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API