Legal Opinion
United States v. 200 WATCHES
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 1946PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, District Judge.
Petitioners’ property has been seized by the customs authorities and they now ask that it be restored to them. 22 U.S.C.A. § 403. The ground of the seizure was that petitioners were guilty of an attempt to export the articles seized in violation of law. 22 U.S.C.A. § 401.
Both proceedings were tried together, and the facts which I now set forth are derived from statements of counsel at the trial, and from such allegations of the petitions as are undisputed.
On October 20, 1945, S. S. Salem Maritime sailed from Los Angeles, California, bound for Yokohama, Japan. Before…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Lead Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Swan & Finch Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. Two Hundred & Sixty-Seven Twenty-Dollar Gold PiecesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1919
- United States v. 21 Pounds, 8 Ounces, of PlatinumCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Paul AjlounyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. EdwardsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1982
- Citronelle-Mobile Gathering, Inc. v. HerringtonTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1987
- United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Matson Navigation Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.