Legal Opinion
DeVille v. Hiland Dairy Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 2005No. 26188PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) affirmed an award of workers’ compensation benefits to Mark DeVille (“DeVille”). Hiland Dairy Company (“Employer”) appeals, urging reversal by asserting the following: (1) De-Ville was not working when the injury happened; (2) the injury was idiopathic, hence DeVille’s employment was not a substantial factor in causing injury; and (3) Commission’s finding that the injury arose out of DeVille’s employment was an insufficient basis to support the award as a matter of law. This court affirms.
FACTS
In 1986,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Kasl v. Bristol Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Cox v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Drewes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- Abel Ex Rel. Abel v. Mike Russell's Standard ServiceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Van Winkle v. LEWELLENS PROFESS. CLEANING, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Huffmaster v. American Recreation ProductsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gardner v. Contract Freighters, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005