Legal Opinion
Kaiser v. Butchart
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 20, 1937No. Nos. 31,197, 31,198PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Appeals by defendants Harris, Upham & Company from orders of the district court overruling demurrers to the amended complaint in each of the above entitled actions.
The same parties are named as defendants in each action and for convenience may be divided .into three groups: (1) The Butchart organization; (2) Harris, Upham & Company; and (3) Thomson & McKinnon.. The first group, composed of David' D. Butchart, Robert B. Harrington, Arthur Soshea, and George N. Butchart, all residents of St. Louis county, operated under the name of D. D. Butchart. Defendant George N.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Osborne v. McMastersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. GutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
- Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Anderson v. SettergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Mayberry v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939