Rachel v. Rachel
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1DissentGeorge K. Cracraft, Judge
I would grant the petition for rehearing and affirm the decree as entered. I fully agree that divorce is a creature of statute and that, prior to the enactment of Act 267 of 1981, divorce in contested cases could only be granted on proof of a statutory ground duly corroborated. That enactment retained the requirement of proof of statutory grounds but relaxed the requirement of corroborating testimony so that Ark. Stat. Ann. § 34-1207.1 (Repl. 1985) now reads as follows:
Hereafter in uncontested divorce suits corroboration of plaintiffs ground or grounds for divorce shall not be necessary nor…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brizzolara v. PowellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Brady v. Alken, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. Gilbert, Adm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Simmons First National Bank v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Moore v. City of BlythevilleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.