Legal Opinion

Schnitzer Steel Products Co. v. Henry C. Eastburn & Son, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 31, 1951No. 433, Civil Action 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J. :

The purpose of this suit is to recover possession of a large Bay City crane, or its value. Ownership is claimed by both parties. It is a case where one of two innocent parties must suffer loss caused primarily by the default of a third person.

In February 1949, plaintiff made a contract for the sale to one Richard Thorpe, who traded under the name of Thorpe’s Machine Company, of several items of large machinery, including the crane here involved. In the same month, plaintiff shipped this machinery from Portland, Oregon, by railroad to its own order at May’s Landing, New Jersey,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Geller v. Transamerica CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943
  2. Allen v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1942
  3. Board of Public Instruction for County of Hernando v. MeredithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  4. Commercial Credit Co. Inc. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Kearby v. Western States Securities Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. In Re WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API