In re the Estate of Cromwell
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
On this application, a substitution of attorneys and the turnover of papers have already been granted and new counsel has for some months been in full charge of the proceedings in behalf of the administrator. The remaining questions under consideration are an application to require a refund by the former counsel of a portion of the fees heretofore paid him, and a further application to require such counsel to turn over the specific sum of $515.50 collected by him as the proceeds of a check alleged to be part of the assets of the estate. This court has undoubted power to supervise…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Bailey v. RutherfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- In re the Estate of BalazsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933