Legal Opinion
United States v. Bily
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1975No. Crim. 75-457PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
This is a criminal prosecution under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 1, 101, and 104. 1 The defendant has made three pretrial motions. He moves this Court to quash the indictment, to suppress evidence, and to return seized property. Our disposition of these three motions is as follows. The motion to quash is denied. 2 The motion to suppress evidence is denied as to evidence obtained in the search of January 9, 1975, except that it is granted as to the copy of the film, “White Christmas.” The motion is granted as to all evidence seized in the search…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Philip Berrigan, in No. 72-1938, and Elizabeth McAlister Appeal of Elizabeth McAlister InCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Harve D. Mason and Pat J. Mason v. Ralph J. Pulliam (Special Agent/intelligence Division, Irs) and Jim Kelly(supervisor/intelligence Division, Irs)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- United States v. Woodrow W. Wise, Jr., Dba Hollywood Film ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Daniel AlfaroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- American International Pictures, Inc. v. ForemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.