Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 30, 1976No. Z-186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Reynolds appeals from judgments and imprisonment sentences for breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny and grand larceny. He asserts that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that the trial court erred in failing to repeat entirely, when requested to do so by the jury, its charges on the elements of breaking and entering with intent to commit grand larceny and on the State’s burden of proof.

Just before midnight on the night of the offenses, witnesses looked through the plate glass windows of Whitehill Equipment Company in Tallahassee and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faulk v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  2. McKenna v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  3. Henderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Henderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  3. Clark Daniel Mayers v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API