Legal Opinion
Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 18, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
This is an action by a British corporation for infringement, of eight separate copyrights, of plaintiff’s mezzotint engravings in color, by the defendants, alleged to have wrongfully reproduced photolithographs thereof. The Court, in an Interlocutory Judgment and Order of Reference dated December 5, 1947, 74 F.Su-pp. 973, found infringement; enjoined the defendants from further infringement and from further sale or disposal of any or all of the infringing photolithographs in their possession or under their control; and decreed that the plaintiff recover from the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- MCA, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Business Trends Analysts, Inc. v. The Freedonia Group, Inc. And the Freedonia Group, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Lewis Orgel and the Michie Company v. Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., and Alfred D. JahrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, and United States of America v. Lyles & Lang Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- Deltak, Inc. v. Advanced Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.