Legal Opinion

Ruggiero v. American Fidelity Fire Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 10, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated February 1, 1980 (Klein, J.), affirmed, with $10 costs.

This appeal raises a question of first impression on the effectiveness of an auto insurance cancellation notice under section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.

Section 313 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law dictates that: "Every such notice of termination [of auto liability policies] for any such cause whatsoever sent to the insured shall include in type * * * which * * * shall not be smaller than twelve point a statement * * * [that the insured must maintain proof of financial security…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Government Employees Insurance v. MizellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Messing v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Olivio v. Government Employees Insurance Co. of Washington, D. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State Wide Insurance v. SapperNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Utica Mutuall Insurance v. MorroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & GriffinNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Miller v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API