Legal Opinion

Nation v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 8, 1934No. 6 Div. 430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Tho purpose of this suit is to establish a claim against a state bank in liquidation, after it has been rejected by the superintend-ent of banks. Sections 6311, 6312, Code.

The evidence shows that on and prior to November 24, 1930, A. A. Fendley was president of Blount County State Bank and also president -of Oneonta Guaranty Company. The business offices of the two institutions .adjoined, connected by a door in the rear of the partition wall. Mr. Fendley was accustomed to transact his duties for them both from his office in the room of the Oneonta ■Guaranty Company, where he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. American State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Jumper v. BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  3. In re BenselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Benson & Co. v. ForemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Williams v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API