Legal Opinion

People v. Haydon

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1951No. Crim. 2745PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether section 72 of the Penal Code was repealed pro tanto by the enactment of section 101 of the Unemployment Insurance Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1226; 3 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 8780(d)).

Record

Defendant was convicted of the crime of felony, to wit, violation of section 72 of the Penal Code, in that with intent to defraud he wilfully presented for payment a false and fraudulent claim for California unemployment insurance and received payment thereon. He does not attack the sufficiency of the evidence, but contends that the later enactment of section 101(a) of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GillilandSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bartlett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  3. People v. NealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Shelton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. United States v. WindhamDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Adams v. CulverSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  3. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. DavidsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. EarnestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API