Legal Opinion

Harker v. Southern California Edison Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1927No. Docket No. 3261PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action by plaintiffs to recover damages from the defendant on account of the destruction of certain property by fire alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. Plaintiff B. L. A. Barngrover had judgment and defendant appeals.

The complaint sets forth that the respondent Barngrover is and was at all times mentioned therein the owner of certain real property and the buildings thereon situated in the county of Tulare, state of California, commonly known and designated as the Porterville Magnesite Mill; that the plaintiffs Barker and Hoff were at the times mentioned in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Benson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Benjamin v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Gish v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API