Legal Opinion
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 7, 1989No. CV-87-2173PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
726 F.Supp. 426 (1989)
In re JOINT EASTERN and SOUTHERN DISTRICT ASBESTOS LITIGATION.
Frank RUMMO and Betty Rummo, Plaintiffs,
v.
The CELOTEX CORPORATION, Defendant.
No. CV-87-2173.
United States District Court, E.D. New York.
December 7, 1989.
Jay W. Dankner, Abby J. Resnick, Sullivan & Liapakis, P.C., New York City, for plaintiffs.
David Speziali, Speziali & Constantine, Newfield, N.J., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff is dying of mesothelioma, a dread cancer of the lining of the lungs, as a result of his work with asbestos thirty years ago in the Brooklyn Navy…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. GaudetSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- John R. McWeeney v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Poulin v. Boston Scientific CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
- West v. Bell Helicopter, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013