Legal Opinion

United States v. Ball

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1924No. 3409Published

Albert K. Ball and others, indicted for violation of Penal Code, § 215, demur to the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

WITMER, District Jud^e.

The defendants, Albert K. Ball, Mark Ball, and Eouis Ball, were indicted, charged with a violation of section *751215 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). The indictment contained one count alleging that the defendants “did unlawfully, willfully, maliciously, and feloniously devise a scheme or artifice to defraud, and to use the mail service of the United States government to carry said scheme into effect,” and that in pursuance to said fraudulent scheme or artifice the said defendants did “make out and send, and cause to be sent, postage paid, through the United…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Moffatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. Bettman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  5. Sandals v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API