Hannuniemi v. Carruth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This action of contract was commenced, against the first named defendant, an insurance agent, and two insurance companies. The action was discontinued against one insurance company and is prosecuted against the other two defendants, who hereafter will be termed respectively the agent and the company. The trial judge found that a policy of fire insurance on certain personal property was executed in the name of the plaintiff and went into effect and was paid for on May 23, 1929. It must be assumed for the purposes of this decision that that finding was warranted because that question is not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- McDonough v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Thomes v. Meyer Store Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Greenough v. Phoenix InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Segal v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Depot Cafe Inc. v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- French King Realty Inc. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Romanos v. Home InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Phelan v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.