Legal Opinion

Raymond v. Williston

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 23, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Law. Action by Arthur J. Raymond against James R. Willis-ton. On motion to strike.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

Application has been made to strike out paragraph 3 of the complaint, as shown by. the record.upon removal.

It appears that, in an action for divorce brought by Arthur J. Ray*526mond (the plaintiff here) against his wife, the defendant in this action (James R. Williston) was named as corespondent and was served with the pleadings in the divorce action. He did not appear or defend, and judgment on the merits against the wife was entered granting divorce. According to the papers, this judgment was based upon acts alleged to have been committed with the said Williston.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. . BiggarNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Billings v. BillingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Billings v. BillingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API