Hudson v. State

OPINION

ROBERTS, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of subsequent offense driving while intoxicated, a felony. The jury assessed his punishment at five years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s second ground of error urges that his motion for instructed verdict should have been granted because there was no evidence that he had in fact driven the vehicle.

The statement of facts reveals that the State offered the testimony of three witnesses, two of whom were the arresting officers. Since the testimony of these officers was substantially the same, it will be summarized.

The officers were patrolling on State…