Legal Opinion

Padgett v. Horace-Mann Insurance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 1997No. 96-3614PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PER. CURIAM.

Terry L. Padgett appeals a summary final judgment determining that no uninsured motorist (“UM”) benefits were due him from appellee, Horace Mann Insurance Company (“Horace Mann”), because of a limitation on UM coverage an insurer may impose if an insured elects non-stacked coverage. We reverse.

Padgett sued Horace Mann alleging that his son was killed while a passenger in a vehicle driven by an underinsured motorist. Padgett had been paid the limits of the driver’s applicable coverage, as well as UM benefits from his son’s insurer, Infinity Southern, in the amount of $20,000. When…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CAS. v. SwindalSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Mathews v. Ranger Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  3. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. MallardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Star Indem. Co. v. W. Fla. Village Inn, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API