Rural Special School Districts Nos. 24 & 63 v. Hatfield Special School District No. 22
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). It is contended for reversal that a majority of the electors did not sign the petition and that their status became fixed upon the filing of the first petitions, the giving of notice, etc., and that the court- erred in not permitting the remonstrants’ names to he stricken from the petitions, and in counting the names of certain petitioners which had been signed hy other parties.
The statutes require the giving of notice of a proposed change in. a school district, and provide the authority for the creation of new districts or change of boundaries of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mitchell v. Directors of School District No. 13Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Acree v. PattersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Priest v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Lewis v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
- Bridewell v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walton v. RuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Arterburn v. SummersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962