Legal Opinion

Smoak v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 18, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOBSON, Justice.

The appellant Smoak was informed against for grand larceny, tried before the court without a jury (jury trial having been waived) and found guilty.

The State produced two witnesses, Miss Acerra and Miss Gottshall. The record discloses that the appellant Smoak was visiting Miss Gottshall at her apartment during the early hours of the morning on Sunday, November 21, 1954. Miss Acerra, Miss Gottshall’s apartment mate, returned home from work at approximately 1:00 A. M., and placed a sum of money under a couch in the living room. The appellant Smoak and Miss Gottshall were lying on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  2. Bargesser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Horton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Redding v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. E.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Reynolds v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API