Legal Opinion

Gilcrest v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 18, 2023No. 2:20-cv-00854Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER GILCREST, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 2:20-CV-854-SLB-KFP ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE Christopher Gilcrest is before the Court with his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, in which he raises claims for relief under Rehaif v. United States,

139 S. Ct. 2191

(2019). Doc. 1.1 For the reasons discussed below, the Court RECOMMENDS that Gilcrest’s § 2255 motion be denied without an evidentiary hearing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rehaif v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. United States v. NyhuisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Dan ReedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Bernard MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API