Legal Opinion

Arbogast v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 25, 2019No. 0:18-cv-01500Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION Candace Arbogast, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C/A No. 0:18-cv-1500-TMC ) v. ) ORDER ) Andrew Saul, ) Commissioner ) Of Social Security, ) ) Defendant.1 ) On October 10, 2019, Plaintiff Candace Arbogast filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on the bases that she was the prevailing party and that the Commissioner’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. (ECF No. 31). On October 24, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Stephens Ex Rel. RE v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API