Arbogast v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION Candace Arbogast, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C/A No. 0:18-cv-1500-TMC ) v. ) ORDER ) Andrew Saul, ) Commissioner ) Of Social Security, ) ) Defendant.1 ) On October 10, 2019, Plaintiff Candace Arbogast filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, on the bases that she was the prevailing party and that the Commissioner’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. (ECF No. 31). On October 24, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stephens Ex Rel. RE v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.