Legal Opinion

Conaty v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1988No. 15824PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Chief Justice.

Defendant, Patrick Conaty, appeals the trial court’s denial of his request for habe-as corpus. We reverse.

The facts in this case are set out in State v. Conaty, 380 N.W.2d 656 (S.D.1986). 1 Briefly, the evidence shows one Woodhouse and Conaty had an altercation in Conaty’s apartment. Woodhouse threatened to kill Conaty and other tenants. Conaty called the police and upon the arrival of Officer VanDeWalle, he told the officer that Wood-house had threatened him and that he would shoot Woodhouse if he returned. After the officer left, Conaty borrowed a shotgun and shells…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. James Thomas NolanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. Edgar Cherry GantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. Lester Giles PanterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Luna v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Aliberti v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Humphrey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2001
  5. Waff v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API